E211: British Literature to 1760

A Guide to Classical Rhetoric

Alfred J. Drake. Office: Hum. 520 | W 3-4 | ajdrake@ajdrake.com

Richard Kroll, UCI

1. Functions of Rhetoric/Types of Discourse:

a) Deliberative: This branch engages with two major areas:

questions of the worthy (dignitas) or the good (bonum);

questions of action, the expedient, the useful (utilitas).

b) Judicial or Forensic: This "legal" branch deals with the following:

questions of right and wrong; legal evidence; guilt and innocence.

c) Ceremonial or Epideictic: Here, the motive is to praise what is already praise- worthy rather than to persuade the audience to the right course of action.

2. The Types of Appeal:

a) Logical (logos)

b) Ethical (ethos)

c) Emotional (pathos)

3. The Divisions of the Standard Oration:

Exordium: a leading into, "beginning a web"--examine the opening of Philip Sidney's Defense of Poesy.

Narratio: a statement of fact, especially in forensic oratory; this is where the speaker sets forth the facts of the case to be decided.

Confirmatio or Probatio: the body of the argument, where the author really gets down to business.

Refutatio: deals with possible objections.

Peroratio: closes the argument--leaves the audience with a good opinion of the speaker; amplifies the force of points made previously; rouses the appropriate emotions in the audience; restates/summarizes the main points of the speech.

-------------------

The Divisions of Classical Rhetoric

Richard Kroll, UCI

Narratio: Stating the facts of the case; situating the audience with regard to the problem at hand.

"In Six Centuries of Literary Hits, John Smith calls attention once again to Milton's anti-feminism."

Bottom line--what is the point?

Propositio: Stating the thesis.

"Resolved: Smith is wrong."

Bottom line--Could the argument be clearer?

Partitio: Dividing up the main problem into smaller sections.

"Smith has always read badly; he skips Book IV of Paradise Lost and the divorce tracts; he himself tried to write a great British religious epic and failed; he beats his third wife.

Bottom line--Are the divisions made logically?

Confirmatio: Proving your argument and its support.

"Moreover, Smith has not even read the divorce tracts; at least, he has not read them carefully," etc.

Bottom line--Prove it!

Refutatio: Refuting opponent's arguments; discussing counterpoints.

"Indeed, the divorce tracts show signs of what Smith calls anti-feminism, but Milton is simply trying in these tracts to accommodate a skeptical audience."

Bottom line--But what about . . . ?

Peroratio: Concluding; summing up; leaving the audience with favorable impressions and appropriate emotions; amplifying points made.

"Smith is trying to hand Milton a bad rap that is bound to muddy our understanding of his time and his writings. Smith keeps us from reading the author of Paradise Lost fairly; Milton was no monster."

Bottom line--So what?