|
E212: British Literature since 1760 Oscar Wilde Study Questions Alfred J. Drake. Office: 423 University Hall "The Critic as Artist" 1. On 1752-53, why, according to Gilbert, is the artist superior to other people? 2. On 1754-57, how does Gilbert delineate the "highest criticism" (1755)? Why is the critic superior even to the artist? What can a critic do for the work, according to Gilbert on 1757? 3. What distinctions does Gilbert make on 1759 between the literary and the plastic arts and music? How does he re-evaluate Pater's claim that "all art aspires to the condition of music"? 4. What is the difference between impressionism in art or criticism and the kind of expressive theory we find in, say, Wordsworth? Why does Gilbert (1756) reject romantic expressivism in favor of his own impressionist doctrine? 5. In your own view, what is the critic's relation to the work of art? Does the art or literary critic have a responsibility to carry out the Arnoldian task of "see[ing] the object as in itself it really is"? (Gilbert discusses this issue on 1759.) 6. In another theoretical essay, "The Decay of Lying," Wilde insists that art (which he aligns with "lying"--spinning stories and creating beautiful images to serve as forms for the imagination) is superior to everyday life. Do you agree or disagree? Why? The Importance of Being Earnest A General Approach: Follow out the plays exploration of key terms, mainly sincerity and marriage. Read as many events and situations as possible in light of what you know about commodification. Is everything a commodity in this play? What might Wilde be suggesting about Victorian values? Act I 7. Why do Jack and Algernon need Ernest and Bunbury, respectively? 8. Keep your eye on the status of the females in this play. What do you think of the fact that Cecily Cardew is Jacks ward and that Gwendolen Fairfax is the closely guarded, yet salable, daughter of Lady Bracknell? Consider Miss Prism and Lady Bracknell, too. 9. Why does Gwendolen want to marry an Ernest? 10. Put Gwendolens ideals together with Lady Bracknells requirements for her suitor and try to explain the importance of marriage in this play. 11. Play around with the account Jack gives of his birth. What is significant about his having been discovered in an ordinary handbag lost in the cloakroom of a railroad car? 12. Jack claims at one point that he is tired of living in a society of wits. What do you think is the function of all the witty paradoxes and epigrams in this play? Act II 13. Notice that the plays setting has now been switched to the country. Is there a legitimate opposition between town and country in Earnest? 14. Miss Prisms Law of Fiction is that the good should end happily, and the bad unhappily. Can one apply Prisms Law to Wildes play as a whole? 15. Dr. Chasuble asks Jack when he wants to be christened, and Jack seems anxious to avoid mixing with the lower orders during this ceremony. This is a good time to ask, what is the use of the lower orders in this piece? 16. While we are on the subject of christening, what is the significance of such an event? Why, that is, are people christened at birth? 17. Just as Gwendolen does, Cecily has a striking way of falling in love. How did she fall in love with Ernest and then develop the affair? Act III 18. Lady Bracknells requirements will now be brought to bear on Cecily. What does Jack give her by way of introduction to Cecilys qualities? Consider Lady Bracknells response to this list; on what authority does she formulate her judgment of Cecily? 19. Miss Prism is recognized by Lady Bracknell and forced to cough up the secret of Jacks birth, and it turns out that she mixed him up with the manuscript of her three-volume novel. What sort of novel was it? Why does the peculiar character of this mix-up matter? 20. What is it to be Earnest, and what is the importance of doing so? Now that we know Jack was always Ernest, what are we supposed to think as we walk out the playhouse door? Edition: Abrams, M.H. et al. The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Volume 2. Seventh edition. New York: Norton, 2000.
|