Preview of version: 4
ESSAY INSTRUCTIONS FOR E317 MILTON, CSU FULLERTON SPRING 2013 (5/3/13)
PROMPTS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TERM PAPER
Due Dates. The final draft will be due as specified at the bottom of the syllabus page. I require emailed attachments in MS Word (or "inline" only if necessary) because it's easier to comment on drafts and maintain records. A one-paragraph topic/argument description will be due by email on the date the syllabus page specifies. See the syllabus for the paper requirement's value as a percentage of the course grade.
General Prompt. Choose one or two assigned texts and, focusing on issues you find relevant and manageable, write a 5-7 page essay specific in its initial thesis, easy to follow in structure, and clear and consistent in style. (Graduates, if any are enrolled in this class, should write a 10-15 page essay that engages with both primary and secondary material.)
I WILL BE POSTING MORE TOPICS, BUT HERE ARE FIVE TO START WITH:
Developing a Topic: You may want to develop a paper topic by refining or adapting one of the study questions on our authors. If so, send me the question or questions that interest you, and I will gladly help you "spin" a good topic. But here are some you may find worthwhile:
1. We have read three prose selections by Milton: "Areopagitica," "The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates," and part of The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce. Choose any one of these and explore the insights to be drawn from the prose piece in connection to one of the longer poetic works we have read: Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, or Samson Agonistes. How does the earlier prose change or enhance our understanding of the later poetic work? Another sub-question might be, has Milton modified or complicated any of the doctrines in his prose to suit his poetic enterprise and argument? If so, how?
2. Lady Alice in Comus undergoes a temptation at the hands of the masque's title character, but to what extent does it compare to the temptation that Eve fails in Paradise Lost? To broaden the question's scope, in comparison to Paradise Lost or Paradise Regained, how does this masque represent evil and the means brought to bear by the good to resist it? What accounts for any differences you may encounter in this regard?
3. It has been said since the Romantic Era that Milton's devil in Paradise Lost is a more energetic, interesting character than his flawless God and Son of God. That may be true with regard to pure storytelling, but there's a great deal more going on in the epic than Satan's exploits. Explore the subtleties of Milton's task in representing God and the Son in Paradise Lost: to what extent, and by what means, does Milton make the Deity dramatically plausible and His ideas and conversation comprehensible? To what extent does he deliberately dwell on the impossibility of representing such perfection, and how does he perhaps even take advantage of that impossibility to drive home certain themes that you find central in the epic?
4. William Blake and Percy Bysshe Shelley, along with many other interpreters of Paradise Lost, have insisted that Milton, as a "true poet and therefore of the Devil's Party" (Blake's phrase in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell) just couldn't help giving Satan the dramatic edge. That reading rings at least partially true since otherwise the poem would lack interest. Still, how does Milton bring out the flawed quality of Satan as an epic hero? How does he manipulate classical epic conventions and manage comparisons between characters to undercut the reader's sympathy with Satan? How do Satan's logic and his rhetoric turn back on him and damage his case against God and for dominion over Hell and Earth?
5. Focus on the complexities of the Narrator of Paradise Lost: the Narrator is, of course, a kind of character in this epic, one that Milton must establish and develop much like any other (especially since the Miltonic narrator isn't as distanced from the action or as "objective" as epic narrators like those of Homer and Virgil). So how (especially but not necessarily exclusively) in the invocations that occur at the beginning of Books 1, 3, 7, and 9, does the Narrator establish sufficient authenticity and authority to tell so grand and complex a story as human history in its relation to the goings-on in heaven? Some other sub-questions might be: at what points does the Narrator bring his own "fallen" frailty into play, and even make them work to his advantage as a storyteller? At what points does he seem willing to suggest that he has at least to some degree transcended that frailty in the name of articulating the poem's argument and telling a story that must be told well? How do his glosses on the epic's events and characters impact our understanding and attitude towards them?
6. Many critics and readers have noted that a fair amount of Paradise Lost revolves around trying to represent the unrepresentable. Such commentary as emerges from this realization often (though of course not always) centers on the representation of God. But the landscapes of this epic also present Milton with a complex task when it comes to representation: how exactly does one represent Hell, for example? Or the Garden of Eden before the Fall of Adam and Eve? Choose something aside from God and His Son and examine what you find to be the thematic or theological/ethical difficulties and opportunities inherent in such an attempt to represent something or some character that, strictly speaking, isn't representable without much alteration and "accommodation" of mortal sensibilities.
Formatting. Follow MLA (Modern Language Association) style. This means, mainly, that you must observe the following formatting rules:
1. Observe 1-inch margins (MS Word uses 1 1/2"; change with Word's file menu Page Setup feature).
2. Double-space text and indented quotations alike. That is, don't single-space quotations.
3. Avoid extra paragraphing spaces or extra spaces anywhere (after title, etc.). Therefore, tab-indent the first line of regular paragraphs 1/2 inch rather than block-styling them, which would require extra spaces.
4. Indent long quotations of more than four lines from the left; there's no need to indent from the right.
5. Number your essay's pages in header at top right: use Word's insert menu Page Numbers feature to do that. Then input your last name with Word's view menu "header and footer" feature. The command "control/letter r" will right-justify the header text you type.
6. Include at top left on separate double-spaced lines your name, the instructor's name, bare course title, and date. Then add your centered title. A typical paper would begin like this:
Professor Montgomery Burns
25 December 2010
Why Should I Study English if I'm Never Going to England?!
7. Introduce and cite sources properly within your essay. See my Grammar Guide for the relevant conventions.
8. Offer a "works cited" list on the last page of your document even if an anthology is your only text. Again, see Grammar Guide for the relevant conventions, or refer to a book every humanities major should have: The MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7th. edition. New York: MLA, 2009. ISBN-13: 978-1603290241.
Rough Drafts (Optional). If you give me a rough draft or some portion of one, I will read it carefully and offer substantive comments. With regard to stylistic matters, I have a detailed online Grammar Guide, portions of which I include as "autotexts" with the MS Word Track Changes feature as I go through a draft. I will not simply "fix" rough drafts since that discourages students from doing their own editing. Self-expression and the desire to say something important are good reasons to write, but they alone do not make a person a good writer. That takes time and respect for the medium itself, including its formal conventions.
Research and "Works Cited" For undergraduates, research is optional. The main thing is to attend closely to the assigned texts. If you like to do outside reading and work with theoretical approaches, that's good, but this assignment is not technically a research paper. Even if you don't incorporate outside research, you still need to include a separate Works Cited page at the end of the essay. That is because you will, of course, be citing at least one of the assigned texts. Use MLA guidelines for citing sources. As for graduates, your longer paper should incorporate at least some secondary material, but I leave the relative balance between primary and secondary material to your discretion. Libraries: Chapman, CSUF.
Additional Guides. I have written many guides to help students with composing, editing, and polishing their essays. Please look over some of this site's materials on writing: see the Resources/Guides section of your course menu, and click on "Writing Guides" to view the list. Here are links to the main ones: MLA, Grammar, Deductive, Citing, Analyzing, and Editing.
Advance Draft Comments
Your essay doesn't need to offer exhaustive commentary about the work or author chosen, and it doesn't need to provide huge amounts of background information about history, the author's life, and so forth. Instead, examine your text/s on the specific things (problems, issues, themes, etc.) you want to write about, and be willing to grapple directly and in some detail with the actual language of your chosen work. Try to write a paper that leads your readers towards genuine insights based on a patient, well-structured analysis of particular passages (and flexible points of comparison, for comparative essays). If your essay makes a reader feel like re-reading all or some of the literary work in question, you will have done your job well.
1) Thesis presentation in your first paragraph
The paper should go well beyond summarizing, though a little summarizing may be necessary as context for quotations and (in your first paragraph) just to explain what kind of story you are dealing with. The last several sentences of your first paragraph should explain what specific, manageable section of the text you will write about and why you are going to write about it. The "why" part should be more specific than "I want to explore certain characters' actions and relationships, and later on I'll tell you what the point of doing that was." Your reader wants to know what you have already discovered and what you will, therefore, be explaining in detail later. That's deductive structure, as illustrated in the sample paper: here's my argument / now I'm citing and analyzing key passages to show how I arrived at it / now I am wrapping up the argument and reflecting on it.
Thesis Development. In the drafting stages of a deductive essay, the thesis in the first paragraph is often vague, more like a general topic than a specific argument. In a deductive essay, one states claims at the outset and then explores them; however, insights tend to develop inductively. That is, what the writer wants to say emerges only gradually, and becomes sharpest towards the end of the paper. The most efficient way to sharpen your first paragraph is to look over what you write in the middle and conclusion of your essay, and tie it all together into a few sentences that will serve as your thesis. That way, you can turn an inductive rough draft into a deductive final draft, and avoid allowing initially vague claims to get the better of you: unless handled with care, ideas quickly become traps.
Avoiding Generalities. Do not begin your first paragraph with filler such as, "Throughout history, man has fallen in love and written poetry." That is an irrecoverable sign that the writer has little of substance to say. Also avoid literary appreciation filler such as "Ben Jonson's plays are immortal."
2) Argument structure and handling of quotations in the main essay
The aim here is to offer sustained analysis of substantive quotations for which you have provided adequate context, and a conclusion that develops logically from the middle section without simply repeating your thesis. Ideally, there should not be only extremely brief quotations; showcasing a few longer passages and staying with them improves emphasis and structure. In a comparative paper, it's usually best to deal with the texts in two solid blocks rather than to go back and forth between them several times.
3) Grammar and Style
Grammar and style. Key things are consistent verb tense use (present tense is usually best), active voice, and straightforward (not wordy or contorted) sentence structure. A Works Cited page should be included even if you only cite the assigned text/s, and MLA quotation formatting should be correct: see the sample paper available in Writing Guides. Failure to proofread and edit carefully in the final stages is a major factor in poor grades.
More thoughts on style. Avoid vague introductory language or empty praise of the author in question. A statement like "Throughout history so-and-so has been considered a great author" is padding. Get rid of sentences that function only as warm-up for specific analysis, somewhat like filler. Read your paper out loud, and you will get rid of many filler phrases and awkward constructions. We make mistakes in everyday speech, but at least we don't say things like "objective consideration of contemporary phenomena necessitates the inevitable conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity."
GRADES FOR THE FINAL DRAFT
If you earn a B+, an A-, or an A, that's great. The A range grades mean that I really didn't see major problems in your thesis, your handling of quotations and organization of the essay, or your grammar and style. I found your paper sophisticated and well written. If you earn a B+ or A-, that generally means your thesis was good but that the grammar and style issues kept the paper from being an outright "A." I have marked up a few pages of your essay to indicate any problems with grammar and style, and possibly with minor thesis/content issues if I found any.
If you get a B, that's good, too. A "B" is solid work, with some room for improvement both in terms of content (i.e. thesis presentation and inclusion/handling of quotations), and style/grammar. The paper markup should indicate some areas in need of work.
If you earn a B- or C+, that's no catastrophe, but you can do better. Invariably this range of grades means that grammar/style problems slowed me down when I was reading your paper, even if they didn't keep me from understanding the basic argument. Often additional problems were that the thesis remained somewhat general and that the paper didn't make its case mainly through analysis of specific quotations.
If you do not get at least a C, the grade means that I saw some serious problems with both content/organization and with grammar/style, or that you simply didn't meet the requirements for the paper, i.e. you turned in a one-pager with no textual analysis, or some such thing.
An F grade usually stems from plagiarized content, whether in part or in entirety, which is also grounds for failure in the course. Sources must always be documented.